- the United States represents the extreme - have tended to regard political advertising as natural. It is paramount to democratic electoral processes therefore, that all candidates and parties are provided equal access to media for this endeavour. In general, the principle that anyone can have access to the public electoral process and write or broadcast about it is the paramount one. Cutting off the internet can curb dissent, limit the organization capabilities of the opposition and prevent journalists from funny mistakes in essays doing their work, amongst others.
MSc Global Media and Communications (LSE and UCT) ST josephs catholic high school Centre staff - LSE Cities The importance of digital technology in life - UKEssays NxG Leadership Team FBN
Media and Elections - ACE Electoral Knowledge Network
Nevertheless, access to information by people - and voters in particular - differs enormously depending on national and subnational contexts. . For instance, in 2013 Pakistan shutdown the internet arguing this would help keep the visiting Chinese Premier safe (Aydin, 2016). The sustainability of free and independent media is reliant on media literate audiences and information providers. There are two competing trends here. In countries such as the United States, we might find stronger TV effects. The compulsory blackouts of coverage in the days before an election that continue in countries like France are a relic of that period - when the media seemed to go out of their way not to influence the outcome of an election. Addendum, Tenth anniversary joint declaration: Ten key challenges to freedom of expression in the next decade, (UN General Assembly, UN doc. EMB strengths and weaknesses;. .